U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

PI-Submitted Research Highlights for
Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program

Differences in Soluble Organic Carbon Chemistry in Pore Waters Sampled from Different Pore Size Domains

Vanessa Bailey
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory


Soil samples used during the study.

10 January 2017
Protecting Soils to Mitigate Climate Change.

The Science
Soil has networks of pores and channels that weave through it like interconnected straws. They’re formed underground by the different minerals that compose soil and as a result of movements or growth by roots, insects, and other living organisms. The pores in soil house gases and liquids, such as soil organic carbon and water. Soil organic carbon, or SOC, plays a vital role in the carbon cycle. According to a recent study by researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and published in Soil Biology and Biochemistry, the complexity of the carbon differs with the size of the pore that contains it, yet its decomposability is driven by its proximity to microorganisms, not its chemistry.

The Impact
The research findings could provide a powerful framework for building a new generation of models simulating SOC dynamics and composition. It also provides a way to use natural processes to protect SOC so that it remains or decomposes in the soil rather than returning to the atmosphere.

In the natural water cycle, the hydrologic connectivity of soil pores surges as soil water content increases, and when pore channels fill with water, SOC and other nutrients can mix and redistribute. And when the soil is saturated, soil pores become increasingly connected (making them straw-like) by water, allowing movement of dissolved SOC between pores. This increases the likelihood that stored carbon will be transported to microbial-rich locations more favorable to decomposition. This diverse distribution of microbial decomposers throughout soil indicates that metabolism or persistence of SOC compounds is highly dependent upon short distances — think “sprints” — of transport between pores, via water, within the soil.

To demonstrate this, PNNL researchers saturated intact soil cores and extracted pore waters with increasing suction pressures to sequentially sample them from increasingly fine pore domains. The soil solutions were held behind coarse and fine pore “throats,” and revealed more complex soluble carbon in finer pores than in coarser ones. Analysis of the same samples—incubated with fungi Cellvibrio japonicus, Streptomyces cellulosae, and Trichoderma reseei — showed that the more complex carbon in fine pores is not more stable — that is, it is at least as easily decomposed as the simpler forms of C found in coarse pores.  In fact, the decomposition of complex carbon led to greater losses of it through respiration than the simpler carbon found in coarse pore waters. This suggests that repeated cycles of drying and wetting in soils may be accompanied by repeated cycles of increased carbon dioxide emissions. All this raises a question: Is SOC persistence primarily a function of its isolation in different sized pores?

All the study’s incubated samples demonstrated that the fungi could decompose the SOC in pore waters within the first 48 hours of colocation. This means that the proximity of microbes with the substrate is the controlling factor in protecting carbon within the soil. The challenge is to use this information to improve our predictions of C persistence in soils and perhaps determine if and how we can take advantage of these natural processes within the soil on a much bigger scale so that we reduce carbon in the atmosphere.

Contacts (BER PM)
Daniel Stover and Jared DeForest
Daniel.Stover@science.doe.gov (301-903-0289) and Jared.DeForest@science.doe.gov (301-903-1678)

(PI Contact)
Vanessa Bailey, (509) 371-6965, Vanessa.bailey@pnnl.gov

BER, Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program

Bailey, V. et al, “Differences in soluble organic carbon chemistry in pore waters sampled from different pore size domains.” Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry 107, 133-143 (2017). [DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.025]

BER, Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program

Search TES PI-Submitted Highlights

  • Search

Highlight Submission