The sensitivity of climate to changes in the concentration of greenhouse gases and aerosols in the atmosphere plays a crucial role in how to adapt to or mitigate global change. In 2007, Roe and Baker claimed (Science, vol. 318, p. 629) that this sensitivity is intrinsically unpredictable and that socio-economic and political decisions need to rely on the danger posed by global warming, not on narrowing the range of uncertainties in determining climate sensitivity. DOE funded scientists Drs. Zaliapin and Ghil have now identified a simple mathematical error underpinning Roe and Baker's argument. This new approach holds promise for evaluating the distance of the current climate state from "tipping points" like catastrophic warming or catastrophic cooling.
Reference: I. Zaliapin and M. Ghil, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, vol. 17, pp. 113-122.
Contact: Renu Joseph, SC-23.1, (301) 903-9237
SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)