E3SM land model analysis efficiently identifies key sensitive parameters, organized by plant functional types.
A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was performed using a new methodology on the Energy Exascale Earth System (E3SM) v1 land model that indicates the key parameters driving uncertainty in model projections of carbon and energy-related outputs. The GSA was performed across 96 sites representing a wide range of climatic conditions and vegetation types. A small subset of the parameters analyzed was identified as sensitive, and parameter sensitivities were found to be consistent within a vegetation type.
Understanding parametric sensitivities in land models can aid in prioritization of model development and observations targeted to reduce prediction uncertainties. Uncertainty quantification techniques, which include parameter sensitivity analysis, are an important tool to evaluate uncertainties associated with specific processes (for example, photosynthesis or plant respiration). The methods developed here are also a first step towards formal model calibration at a global scale.
Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of high-dimensional, nonlinear models such as E3SM using traditional methods requires a large number of simulations and is prohibitively expensive from a computational standpoint. Here, a GSA is conducted by first constructing a surrogate representation of the full E3SM land model using a new method to handle the high-dimensional parameter space with a relatively small number of E3SM land model evaluations. This surrogate model allows for efficient extraction sensitivity information, leading to the identification of insensitive parameters and reducing the dimensionality of the problem. The GSA is performed at 96 FLUXNET sites covering multiple plant functional types (PFTs) and climate conditions for five carbon and energy-related model outputs. About 20 of the model parameters are identified as sensitive with the rest being relatively insensitive across all outputs and PFTs. These sensitivities are dependent on PFT, and are relatively consistent among sites within the same PFT. The five model outputs have a majority of their highly sensitive parameters in common. A common subset of sensitive parameters is also shared among PFTs, but some parameters are specific to certain types (e.g., deciduous phenology).The relative importance of these parameters shifts significantly among PFTs and with climatic variables such as mean annual temperature.
Contacts (BER PMs)
Earth System Modeling
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Funding was provided by the Earth System Modeling program through the Energy Exascale Earth System Modeling (E3SM) project within the DOE Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research.
Ricciuto, D., K. Sargsyan, and P. Thornton. "The Impact of Parametric Uncertainties on Biogeochemistry in the E3SM Land Model." Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 10, 297-319 (2018). [DOI:10.1002/2017MS000962]
CESD Research Highlight
SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)