Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory examined simulations of the observable present-day climate to diagnose how the version 0.3 of the Department of Energy’s new climate model represented the global water cycle. Comparing with the best available observational datasets, they determined that while the model captured most fundamental aspects of the global water cycle, the model also produced long-standing biases, which were only partially improved with increasing resolution.
This study contributes to the growing number of studies that evaluate the impact of increasing the resolution on a climate model’s ability to better represent the water cycle. It also provides a new framework to diagnose why the precipitation is increasingly produced by the large-scale physics scheme, rather than the convective scheme that simulates sub-grid scale cloud motions.
The U.S. Department of Energy is developing a new high-resolution climate model under the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy (ACME) project. One of the its driving questions is, “What are the processes and factors governing precipitation and water cycle today, and how will precipitation evolve over the next 40 years?” This study assessed how well the version 0.3 of the ACME model is able to represent the present-day atmospheric hydrologic cycle and examined how increasing the horizontal resolution from a grid spacing of approximately 100 km to 25 km changes the representation of the global water cycle. This is relevant given that previous studies have reported differing results regarding the impact of horizontal resolution on the water cycle. The model was evaluated using the best available observational estimates, and the diagnosis found several biases in the model, which are shared by other state-of-the-art climate models, namely a global mean precipitation rate that is too high, light rain that occurs too frequently, and an atmospheric residence time of water that is too short. Increasing the resolution does not improve those biases but improves the frequency of heavy precipitation events and shifts the precipitation produced by the convective physics scheme to that produced by the large-scale physics scheme. The study provides a basis on which to compare subsequent versions of the model and provides a reminder of building a body of literature for different models so that we can get a sense for which behaviors are common across all climate models and which are model-dependent.
Contacts (BER PM)
Earth System Modeling Program
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research supported this research as part of the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy (ACME) project of the Earth System Modeling (ESM) program.
Terai, C., P. Caldwell, S. Klein, Q. Tang, M. Branstetter. "The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle in the ACME v0.3 Model." Climate Dynamics (2017). [DOI:10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x].
BER Highlight: Simulating the Global Water Cycle with A High Spatial-Resolution Climate Model
SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)