Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory examined simulations of the observable present-day climate to diagnose how the version 0.3 of the Department of Energy’s new climate model represented the global water cycle. Comparing with the best available observational datasets, they determined that while the model captured most fundamental aspects of the global water cycle, the model also produced long-standing biases, which were only partially improved with increasing resolution.
This study contributes to the growing number of studies that evaluate the impact of increasing the resolution on a climate model’s ability to better represent the water cycle. It also provides a new framework to diagnose why the precipitation is increasingly produced by the large-scale physics scheme, rather than the convective scheme that simulates sub-grid scale cloud motions.
The U.S. Department of Energy is developing a new high-resolution climate model under the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy (ACME) project. One of the its driving questions is, “What are the processes and factors governing precipitation and water cycle today, and how will precipitation evolve over the next 40 years?” This study assessed how well the version 0.3 of the ACME model is able to represent the present-day atmospheric hydrologic cycle and examined how increasing the horizontal resolution from a grid spacing of approximately 100 km to 25 km changes the representation of the global water cycle. This is relevant given that previous studies have reported differing results regarding the impact of horizontal resolution on the water cycle. The model was evaluated using the best available observational estimates, and the diagnosis found several biases in the model, which are shared by other state-of-the-art climate models, namely a global mean precipitation rate that is too high, light rain that occurs too frequently, and an atmospheric residence time of water that is too short. Increasing the resolution does not improve those biases but improves the frequency of heavy precipitation events and shifts the precipitation produced by the convective physics scheme to that produced by the large-scale physics scheme. The study provides a basis on which to compare subsequent versions of the model and provides a reminder of building a body of literature for different models so that we can get a sense for which behaviors are common across all climate models and which are model-dependent.
Contacts (BER PM)
Earth System Modeling Program
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research supported this research as part of the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy (ACME) project of the Earth System Modeling (ESM) program.
Terai, C., P. Caldwell, S. Klein, Q. Tang, M. Branstetter. "The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle in the ACME v0.3 Model." Climate Dynamics (2017). [DOI:10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x].
BER Highlight: Simulating the Global Water Cycle with A High Spatial-Resolution Climate Model
SC-33.1 Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER
Mar 23, 2021
Molecular Connections from Plants to Fungi to Ants
Lipids transfer energy and serve as an inter-kingdom communication tool in leaf-cutter ants&rsqu [more...]
Mar 19, 2021
Microbes Use Ancient Metabolism to Cycle Phosphorus
Microbial cycling of phosphorus through reduction-oxidation reactions is older and more widespre [more...]
Feb 22, 2021
Warming Soil Means Stronger Microbe Networks
Soil warming leads to more complex, larger, and more connected networks of microbes in those soi [more...]
Jan 27, 2021
Labeling the Thale Cress Metabolites
New data pipeline identifies metabolites following heavy isotope labeling.
Aug 31, 2020
Novel Bacterial Clade Reveals Origin of Form I Rubisco
List all highlights (possible long download time)