Econometric analyses uncover differences among crop simulations, and between models and observations, in the responsiveness of yields of US major crops to heat and moisture.
Understanding how yields of major calorie crops respond to weather shocks helps clarify the potential benefits and/or risks of future climate change. Empirical climate change economics studies derive yield responses to temperature and precipitation as simplified, reduced-form relationships using statistical models estimated on observed agricultural production, harvested area and weather. In crop simulations, yield changes are emergent behavior determined by complex interactions among multiple plant growth processes. Researchers at Boston University and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy), working within a multi-institutional Cooperative Agreement led by Stanford University, estimated econometric models of crop yields using observations and crop simulations for identical historical periods and US locations. The researchers compared the resulting reduced-form responses, thereby demonstrating that GGCMs’ yields tended to be more sensitive to adverse weather (extreme high temperature and/or low precipitation) exposures.
Different GGCMs simulate different crop yield changes when forced with the same pattern of historical change in climate. To have confidence in GGCMs’ projections of the future impacts of climate change, and to drive model development, it is important to assess their skill against observations, and understand why differences might arise. This paper develops a method for diagnosing differences in GGCMs’ responses, and for attributing these differences to model characteristics.
Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) are the workhorse of assessments of the agricultural impacts of climate change. Yet the changes in crop yields projected by different models in response to the same meteorological forcing can differ substantially. Through an inter-method comparison, the researchers provide a first glimpse into the origins and implications of this divergence—both among GGCMs and between GGCMs and historical observations. They examine yields of rainfed maize, wheat, and soybeans simulated by six GGCMs as part of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project-Fast Track (ISIMIP-FT) exercise, comparing 1981-2004 hindcast yields over the coterminous United States (US) against US Department of Agriculture (USDA) time series for about 1000 counties. Leveraging the empirical climate change impacts literature, the research team estimate reduced-form econometric models of crop yield responses to temperature and precipitation exposures for both GGCMs and observations. Results demonstrate that up to 60% of the variance in both simulated and observed yields is attributable to weather variation. A majority of the GGCMs have difficulty reproducing the observed distribution of percentage yield anomalies, and exhibit aggregate responses that show yields to be more weather-sensitive than in the observational record over the predominant range of temperature and precipitation conditions. This disparity is largely attributable to heterogeneity in GGCMs' responses, as opposed to uncertainty in historical weather forcings, and is responsible for widely divergent impacts of climate on future crop yields.
Contacts (BER PM)
Integrated Assessment Research
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, Integrated Assessment Research Program, Grant no. DE-SC0005171.
Mistry, M., I. Sue Wing and E. De Cian. 2017. “Simulated vs. empirical weather responsiveness of crop yields: US evidence and implications for the agricultural impacts of climate change,” Environmental Research Letters 12:75007. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa788c
Supplementary Material: PDF
SC-33.2 Biological Systems Science Division, BER
BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER
Jan 11, 2022
No Honor Among Copper Thieves
Findings provide a novel means to manipulate methanotrophs for a variety of environmental and in [more...]
Dec 06, 2021
New Genome Editing Tools Can Edit Within Microbial Communities
Two new technologies allow scientists to edit specific species and genes within complex laborato [more...]
Oct 27, 2021
Fungal Recyclers: Fungi Reuse Fire-Altered Organic Matter
Degrading pyrogenic (fire-affected) organic matter is an important ecosystem function of fungi i [more...]
Oct 19, 2021
Microbes Offer a Glimpse into the Future of Climate Change
Scientists identify key features in microbes that predict how warming affects carbon dioxide emi [more...]
Aug 25, 2021
Assessing the Production Cost and Carbon Footprint of a Promising Aviation Biofuel
Biomass-derived DMCO has the potential to serve as a low-carbon, high-performance jet fuel blend [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)