U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights


The Power of Traditional Proxies for Measuring the Soil Carbon Cycle
Published: November 13, 2017
Posted: January 17, 2018

Solid standbys like clay content should not be displaced by new imaging and genetics techniques.

The Science
Near-term land management and policy decisions depend on proxies, which are used as surrogates for soil features and processes and that affect long-term projections of earth system responses to change. In a new paper, soil ecologists from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory review and classify types of complex soil measurements-called proxies  for the purposes of environmental research.

The Impact
Correlative and integrative proxies in soil carbon (C) cycle measurements have continuing importance because they yield significant insight while being simpler, easier, and cheaper to measure than the actual feature being represented. For example, it is easier to measure clay content as an indicator of soil porosity or carbon storage potential, but understanding which feature is being inferred is important to interpreting the research. The thoughtful use of proxies can lead to new hypotheses and experiments to identify causative relationships; not using proxies may result in overweighting of correlations to explain research results and the misrepresentation of mechanisms.

Summary
In the long history of environmental, soil, and climate change sciences, researchers have always needed proxy variables to improve how complex variables and processes are measured and represented. They have used tree ring chronologies to infer past climate conditions, for instance. And both experimentalists and modelers widely use clay content as a proxy for properties such as bulk density, water-holding capacity, and soil organic matter.

Because of the complexity of processes and interactions within soil, measuring soil C dynamics is another case in which proxies are necessary.

In this realm, ecologists often use two types of proxies. Correlative proxies represent soil characteristics that cannot be directly measured. Integrative  proxies aggregate information about multiple soil characteristics into one variable. Both of these proxies are useful for understanding the soil C cycle and are now being used to make predictions of the C fate and persistence under future climate scenarios. Still, the authors point out, both proxies limit data interpretation.

Meanwhile, new advances in imaging and proteomics have added capabilities and variables to studying the soil C cycle. But so far, these methods are often more expensive and more difficult to measure directly.

In this paper, the authors advocate for the thoughtful use of appropriate proxies for predicting the soil C cycle. Proxies, they say, are simpler, easier, and cheaper to measure, and if used wisely, can suggest new hypotheses and relationships for future study.

Contacts (BER PM)
Daniel Stover
SC-23.1
Daniel.Stover@science.doe.gov (301-903-0289)

(PI Contact)
Vanessa Bailey
PNNL
vanessa.bailey@pnnl.gov (509-371-6965)

Funding
This paper was the product of a working group assembled at a workshop sponsored by the Carbon Cycle Interagency Working Group via the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Program under the auspices of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, “Celebrating the 2015 International Decade of Soil – Understanding Soil’s Resilience and Vulnerability,” Boulder, CO, March 2016. VLB, BBL, RP, and KD were supported by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research as part of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program. KL was supported by NSF DEB-1257032. KTB was supported by Linus Pauling Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship program, part of the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Publications
V. Bailey, et al. “Soil carbon cycling proxies: Understanding their critical role in predicting climate change feedbacks,” Global Change Biology online (2017). [DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13926]

Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Terrestrial Ecosystem Science

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER

 

BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

Aug 24, 2019
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]

Aug 08, 2019
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]

Aug 05, 2019
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]

Jul 29, 2019
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]

Jul 15, 2019
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)