When compared to results from a more complicated surface complexation model with electrostatic correction, the simple model performed just as well but was less computationally intensive.
A simple non-electrostatic model was developed through a step-by-step calibration procedure to describe U (Uranium) plume behavior at the Savannah River site. This simple model was found to be more numerically-efficient than a complex mechanistic model with electrostatic correction terms in predicting long-term U behavior at the site and by extension other uranium contaminated sites.
Significance & Impact
Uranium geochemistry has been extremely challenging to describe and predict. Although complex mechanistic models have been used to describe U sorption in field settings, there is significant uncertainty in model predictions due to scarce field data and modeling assumptions concerning mineral assemblage and subsurface heterogeneity. This study demonstrates that a simpler non-electrostatic model is a powerful alternative for describing U plume evolution at the Savannah River Site (SRS) because it can describe U(VI) sorption much more accurately than a constant coefficient (Kd) approach, while being more numerically efficient than a complex model with electrostatic correction terms. This study provides valuable insight into predicting uranium plume persistence from contaminated sites using simple non-electrostatic models.
The aim of this study was to test if a simpler, semi-empirical, non-electrostatic U(VI) sorption model (NEM) could achieve the same predictive performance as a model with electrostatic correction terms in describing pH and U(VI) behavior at multiple locations within the SRS F-Area. Modeling results indicate that the simpler NEM was able to perform as well as the electrostatic surface complexation model especially in simulating uranium breakthrough tails and long-term trends. However, the model simulations differed significantly during the early basin discharge period. Model performance cannot be assessed during this early period due to a lack of field observations (e.g., initial pH of the basin water) that would better constrain the models. In this manner, modeling results highlight the importance of the range of environmental data that are typically used for calibrating the model.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
This material is based upon work supported as part of the ASCEM project, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management, and as part of the Genomes to Watershed Science Focus Area, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, both under Award Number DE-AC02-05CH11231 to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Arora, B., J.A. Davis, N.F. Spycher, W. Dong, and H.M. Wainwright. 2017. “Comparison of Electrostatic and Non-Electrostatic Models for U (VI) Sorption on Aquifer Sediments” Groundwater. doi:10.1111/gwat.12551.
SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER
May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]
May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]
May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]
May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]
Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)