Particle diversity metric for atmospheric particle population helps quantify cloud droplet errors in climate model predictions assumptions.
While particle cloud droplet nucleation efficiency can in principle be calculated for particles of known size and composition, models break down for atmospheric aerosols which typically consist of mixtures of varying composition. DOE funded scientists have defined a new mixing state index to quantify the degree of internal (all particles have the same composition) and external mixing (subpopulations with distinct but differing compositions) of aerosol populations. The current study investigates the errors in predicted cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations when the atmospheric particle (aerosol) populations vary between external and internal mixtures.
The results show that state-of-the-science single particle measurements need to be deployed and analyzed more frequently to determine when and where externally mixed conditions exist in the atmosphere. They found that establishing a better relationship between the mixing state and CCN will help improve the representation of cloud-aerosol interactions in climate models.
Researchers used the new diversity metric X to assess errors in calculating CCN that result from the treatment of aerosol populations in models, which typically assume total internal mixing. If the aerosol populations are simple (nearly all particles have the same relative composition), these errors are small. However, the errors become large for complex aerosol populations that contain a range of compositions per particle. Scientists combined the new metric with particle-resolved model simulations to quantify errors in CCN predictions when mixing state information is neglected. Researchers explored a range of scenarios that cover different conditions of aerosol aging. The study showed that mixing state information is unimportant for more internally mixed populations; that is, for populations with mixing state index X larger than 60 percent. For more externally mixed populations (X below 20 percent), the relationship between X and the error in CCN predictions is not unique. The error ranges from lower than -40 percent to about 150 percent, depending on the underlying aerosol population and the environmental supersaturation.
Contacts (BER PM)
Atmospheric System Research
Atmospheric System Research
Jerome D. Fast
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
The Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research supported Joseph Ching and Jerome D. Fast as part of the Atmospheric System Research (ASR) program. Additional support for others was provided by the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency.
J. Ching, J. Fast, M. West, N. Riemer, “Metrics to Quantify the Importance of Mixing State for CCN Activity.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 7445-7458 (2017). [DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017] (Reference link)
SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER
May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]
May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]
May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]
May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]
Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)