U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights


Improving Global Methane Emission Predictions
Published: September 13, 2016
Posted: November 22, 2016

A multiscale comparison of modeled and observed seasonal methane emissions in northern wetlands.

The Science
Wetlands are the largest global natural methane (CH4) source, yet predictive capability of land models is low. In a recent study, researchers improved the methane module in the Community Land Model (CLM) and Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy (ACME) Land Model (ALM) and compared predictions with tower and aircraft observations and atmospheric inversions. The findings highlight new observations and model requirements to improve global CH4 predictions.

The Impact
Model changes substantially improved CH4 emission predictions compared to observations. Cold season CH4 emissions estimates remain biased low, motivating more observations during this period. Large CH4 emissions uncertainties also are generated by uncertainties in wetland hydrology.

Summary
The study compared wetland CH4 emission model predictions with site- to regional-scale observations. A comparison of the CH4 fluxes with eddy flux data highlighted needed changes to the model’s estimate of aerenchyma area, which were implemented and tested. The model modifications substantially reduced biases in CH4 emissions when compared with CarbonTracker CH4 predictions. CLM4.5 CH4 emission predictions agree well with Alaskan growing season (May-September) CarbonTracker CH4 predictions and site-level observations. However, the model underestimated CH4 emissions in the cold season (October-April). The monthly atmospheric CH4 mole fraction enhancements due to wetland emissions also were assessed using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (WRF-STILT) model and compared with measurements from the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) campaign. Both the tower and aircraft analyses confirm the underestimate of cold season CH4 emissions. The greatest uncertainties in predicting the seasonal CH4 cycle are from the wetland extent, cold season CH4 production, and CH4 transport processes. Predicted CH4 emissions remain uncertain, but the study’s findings show that benchmarking against observations across spatial scales can inform model structural and parameter improvements.

Contacts (BER PM)
Daniel Stover, Jared DeForest, and Renu Joseph
SC-23.1
Daniel.Stover@science.doe.gov, 301-903-0289; Jared.DeForest@science.doe.gov, 301-903-1678; and renu.joseph@science.doe.gov, 301-903-9237

(PI Contact)
William J. Riley
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
wjriley@lbl.gov

Funding
Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program and Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments–Arctic project under contract # DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Publication
Xu, X., W. J. Riley, C. D. Koven, et al. 2016. “A Multiscale Comparison of Modeled and Observed Seasonal Methane Emissions in Northern Wetlands,” Biogeosciences 13, 5043-56. DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-5043-2016. (Reference link)

Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Earth and Environmental Systems Modeling
  • Research Area: Terrestrial Ecosystem Science
  • Research Area: Carbon Cycle, Nutrient Cycling

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER

 

BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]

May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]

May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]

May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]

Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)