U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights

From Biomass to Hydrogen—Efficiently
Published: December 03, 2015
Posted: April 27, 2016

Cobalt catalyst ideal for producing hydrogen through steam reforming of biomass-derived ethylene glycol.

The Science
Hydrogen production through steam reforming of biomass-derived compounds is an economically feasible and environmentally benign way to efficiently use renewable energy resources. A recent study combined experimental and theoretical approaches to compare the hydrogen yield achieved by several different metal catalysts used for steam reforming of ethylene glycol.

The Impact
The findings show a cobalt (Co) catalyst had a much higher hydrogen yield than rhodium (Rh) or nickel (Ni) catalysts, making it a promising catalyst for steam reforming of ethylene glycol for hydrogen production. Ethylene glycol is a component found in aqueous phases that are produced from the direct liquefaction of plant-derived cellulose or cellulosic oxygenates. The study could lead to the development of more efficient strategies to produce hydrogen from bioderived aqueous phases as an environmentally friendly strategy to power diverse energy needs.

Steam reforming of biomass-derived compounds is a promising strategy for hydrogen production. To realize the full potential of this approach, scientists must identify which catalyst is optimal for producing the highest yield of hydrogen. To address this question, a team of researchers from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) combined experimental and theoretical methods to study steam reforming of ethylene glycol over MgAl2O4-supported Rh, Ni, and Co catalysts. Computational work and advanced catalyst characterization were performed at the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a Department of Energy (DOE) national scientific user facility. Compared to the highly active Rh and Ni catalysts, which achieve 100 percent conversion of ethylene glycol, the steam reforming activity of the Co catalyst was comparatively lower, with only 42 percent conversion under the same reaction conditions. However, use of the Co catalyst rather than the Rh and Ni catalysts resulted in a three-fold drop in methane (CH4) selectivity—a measure of the percentage of ethylene glycol converted to CH4. Calculations revealed the lower CH4 selectivity for the Co catalyst, as compared to the Rh and Ni catalysts, is primarily due to the higher barrier for CH4 formation. The findings demonstrate that the Co catalyst leads to a higher yield of hydrogen, at the expense of CH4, compared with the Rh and Ni catalysts. Additionally, the Co catalyst was also found to offer enhanced catalyst stability compared with the more conventional Ni and Rh catalysts. This information could be used to develop efficient methods for converting biomass-derived compounds into hydrogen for petroleum refining, the production of industrial commodities such as fertilizers, and electricity production via fuel cells.

BER PM Contact:  
Paul Bayer, SC-23.1, 301-903-5324

PI Contacts:
Donghai Mei, PNNL, donghai.mei@pnnl.gov
Robert Dagle, PNNL, robert.dagle@pnnl.gov

This work was supported by DOE’s Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, including support of EMSL, a DOE Office of Science user facility; DOE’s Office of Energy and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technologies Office; PNNL; and National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science user facility.

Mei, D., V. L. Dagle, R. Zing, K. O. Albrecht, and R. A. Dagle. 2015. “Steam Reforming of Ethylene Glycol over MgAl2O4 Supported Rh, Ni, and Co Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 6(1), 315–25. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01666. (Reference link)

Related Links
EMSL article

Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: DOE Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL)
  • Research Area: Plant Systems and Feedstocks, Plant-Microbe Interactions
  • Research Area: Sustainable Biofuels and Bioproducts

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER


BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

Aug 24, 2019
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]

Aug 08, 2019
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]

Aug 05, 2019
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]

Jul 29, 2019
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]

Jul 15, 2019
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)