Errors in physical parameterizations rather than large-scale dynamics appear to cause most model biases.
Clouds represent one of the largest uncertainties in current general circulation model (GCM) simulations. Studies have shown that model discrepancies can come from deficiencies in the physical parameterization and uncertainties in the large-scale atmospheric condition. Unclear, however, is how these discrepancies contribute to model errors.
The newly developed ensemble Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) constrained analysis of atmospheric forcing data accurately specifies the large-scale dynamics conditions along with uncertainty range over the ARM Southern Great Plains (SGP) site. This analysis makes it easier to isolate errors due to model physics when the ensemble data are used to force models.
An ensemble variationally constrained objective analysis of atmospheric large-scale forcing data has been developed for the March 2000 Intensive Observing Period at the ARM SGP site. The ensemble approach uses the uncertainty information of the background data, error covariance matrices, and constraint variables in the ARM constrained variational analysis. The ensemble forcing data are applied to drive the Community Atmosphere Model 5 (CAM5) single-column model and the simulated clouds are compared with MICROBASE cloud retrievals to diagnose the source of model biases. The results show that most of the model biases are larger than the uncertainty from large-scale forcing data plus uncertainty from observations, pointing the simulated cloud biases to model parameterization deficiencies. Sensitivity studies show that background data, error covariance matrix, and constraint variables all contribute to the uncertainty range of the analyzed state variables and large-scale forcing data, especially to the vertical velocity and advective tendencies. Background data have the largest impact. CAM5 simulations of clouds forced by the ARM ensemble forcing data systematically overestimate high clouds, while underestimating low clouds when compared with ARM MICROBASE cloud retrievals. These model biases cannot be explained by the uncertainty of large-scale forcing data and the uncertainty of observations, which points to the deficiencies of physical parameterizations.
Contacts (BER and non-BER)
BER: Shaima Nasiri, SC-23.1, 301-903-0207; and Sally McFarlane, SC-23.1, 301-903-0943
School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, NY, USA
The research at Stony Brook University was supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) within the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Science and the National Science Foundation. Work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory was supported by BER’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program and performed under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. This study uses ARM data.
Tang, S., M. Zhang, and S. Xie. “An ensemble constrained variation analysis of atmospheric forcing data and its application to evaluate clouds in CAM5.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 33-48 (2016). [DOI:10.1002/2015JD024167]. (Reference link)
The 3DCVA source code and data are available from the authors upon request (email@example.com).
SC-33.1 Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, BER
BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER
Jan 11, 2022
No Honor Among Copper Thieves
Findings provide a novel means to manipulate methanotrophs for a variety of environmental and in [more...]
Dec 06, 2021
New Genome Editing Tools Can Edit Within Microbial Communities
Two new technologies allow scientists to edit specific species and genes within complex laborato [more...]
Oct 27, 2021
Fungal Recyclers: Fungi Reuse Fire-Altered Organic Matter
Degrading pyrogenic (fire-affected) organic matter is an important ecosystem function of fungi i [more...]
Oct 19, 2021
Microbes Offer a Glimpse into the Future of Climate Change
Scientists identify key features in microbes that predict how warming affects carbon dioxide emi [more...]
Aug 25, 2021
Assessing the Production Cost and Carbon Footprint of a Promising Aviation Biofuel
Biomass-derived DMCO has the potential to serve as a low-carbon, high-performance jet fuel blend [more...]
List all highlights (possible long download time)