U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights


Statistical Uncertainty of Eddy Covariance CO2 Fluxes Inferred Using Residual Bootstrap Approach
Published: June 15, 2015
Posted: July 24, 2015

Carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange between terrestrial systems and the atmosphere are an important element of the carbon cycle and greenhouse gas climate forcing. High-frequency eddy-covariance measurements of net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) with the atmosphere are valuable resources for model parameterization, calibration, and validation. However, uncertainties in measured data (i.e., data gaps and inherent random errors) create problems for researchers attempting to quantify uncertainties in model projections of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling. In a recent study, researchers demonstrated that a model data fusion method (residual bootstrap) produces defensible annual NEE sums by mimicking the behavior of random errors, filling missing values, and simulating gap-filling biases. Annual NEE sums are estimated for 53 site years based on nine AmeriFlux eddy-covariance tower sites in the United States. In most cases, the annual estimates were comparable in magnitude with those obtained from gap-filled data. Additionally, compared to the AmeriFlux standardized gap filling, this approach provides better NEE estimates for moderate to longer, and more frequent, data gaps. Annual accumulated uncertainties in NEE at the 95% confidence level were ±30 gC m-2 yr-1 for evergreen needleleaf forests, ±60 gC m-2 yr-1 for deciduous broadleaf forests, and ±80 gC m-2 yr-1 for croplands. The residual bootstrap approach performed worst when gap length was greater than one month or data exclusion was greater than 90% during the growing season, common to other gap-filling techniques. However, this study produced robust results for most site years when monthly data coverage during the growing season is not extremely low. These results therefore suggest that the inclusion of NEE uncertainty estimates and better estimation for moderate to longer, and more frequent, data gaps as provided by the residual bootstrap approach can be beneficial for ecosystem model evaluation.

Reference: Wang, H.-J., W. J. Riley, and W. D. Collins. 2015. “Statistical Uncertainty of Eddy Covariance CO2 Fluxes Inferred Using a Residual Bootstrap Approach,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 206, 163–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.011. (Reference link)

Contact: Dorothy Koch, SC-23.1, (301) 903-0105
Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Earth and Environmental Systems Modeling
  • Research Area: Terrestrial Ecosystem Science
  • Research Area: Carbon Cycle, Nutrient Cycling

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER

 

BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]

May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]

May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]

May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]

Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)