U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights


Forest Water Use and Water-Use Efficiency at Two FACE Sites
Published: March 25, 2013
Posted: April 18, 2013

Predicted responses of transpiration to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations are highly variable among process-based models. To better understand and constrain this variability, forest carbon and water flux data from the free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments at Duke University and Oak Ridge National Laboratory were compared to simulations from 11 ecosystem models. A primary objective was to identify key underlying assumptions in model structure that cause differences in model predictions of transpiration and canopy water-use efficiency. Model-to-model and model-to-observations differences resulted from four key sets of assumptions: (1) the nature of the stomatal response to elevated CO2; (2) the roles of the leaf and atmospheric boundary layer; (3) the treatment of canopy interception; and (4) the impact of soil moisture stress. The degree of coupling between carbon and water fluxes, and how that coupling is calculated, is one of the key assumptions that determines how well the models compare with observations. This study yields a framework for analyzing and interpreting model predictions of transpiration responses to elevated CO2. This approach highlights key areas for immediate model improvement, hypotheses for experimental testing, and opportunities for data synthesis to significantly reduce discrepancies among models.

Reference: Kauwe, M. G., B. E. Medlyn, S. Zaehle, A. P. Walker, M. C. Dietze, T. Hickler, A. K. Jain, Y. Luo, W. J. Parton, C. Prentice, B. Smith, P. E. Thornton, S. Wang, Y. P. Wang, D. Wårlind, E. S. Weng, K. Y. Crous, D. S. Ellsworth, P. J. Hanson, H. Seok-Kim, J. M. Warren, R. Oren, and R. J. Norby. 2013. “Forest Water Use and Water Use Efficiency at Elevated CO2: A Model-Data Intercomparison at Two Contrasting Temperate Forest FACE Sites,” Global Change Biology, DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12164. (Reference link)

Contact: Mike Kuperberg, SC-23.1, (301) 903-3281, Daniel Stover, SC-23.1, (301) 903-0289
Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Terrestrial Ecosystem Science
  • Research Area: Carbon Cycle, Nutrient Cycling
  • Research Area: Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER

 

BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]

May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]

May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]

May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]

Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)