U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights


Forest Water Use and Water-Use Efficiency at Two FACE Sites
Published: March 25, 2013
Posted: April 18, 2013

Predicted responses of transpiration to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations are highly variable among process-based models. To better understand and constrain this variability, forest carbon and water flux data from the free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments at Duke University and Oak Ridge National Laboratory were compared to simulations from 11 ecosystem models. A primary objective was to identify key underlying assumptions in model structure that cause differences in model predictions of transpiration and canopy water-use efficiency. Model-to-model and model-to-observations differences resulted from four key sets of assumptions: (1) the nature of the stomatal response to elevated CO2; (2) the roles of the leaf and atmospheric boundary layer; (3) the treatment of canopy interception; and (4) the impact of soil moisture stress. The degree of coupling between carbon and water fluxes, and how that coupling is calculated, is one of the key assumptions that determines how well the models compare with observations. This study yields a framework for analyzing and interpreting model predictions of transpiration responses to elevated CO2. This approach highlights key areas for immediate model improvement, hypotheses for experimental testing, and opportunities for data synthesis to significantly reduce discrepancies among models.

Reference: Kauwe, M. G., B. E. Medlyn, S. Zaehle, A. P. Walker, M. C. Dietze, T. Hickler, A. K. Jain, Y. Luo, W. J. Parton, C. Prentice, B. Smith, P. E. Thornton, S. Wang, Y. P. Wang, D. Wårlind, E. S. Weng, K. Y. Crous, D. S. Ellsworth, P. J. Hanson, H. Seok-Kim, J. M. Warren, R. Oren, and R. J. Norby. 2013. “Forest Water Use and Water Use Efficiency at Elevated CO2: A Model-Data Intercomparison at Two Contrasting Temperate Forest FACE Sites,” Global Change Biology, DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12164. (Reference link)

Contact: Mike Kuperberg, SC-23.1, (301) 903-3281, Daniel Stover, SC-23.1, (301) 903-0289
Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Terrestrial Ecosystem Science
  • Research Area: Carbon Cycle, Nutrient Cycling
  • Research Area: Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER

 

BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

Aug 24, 2019
New Approach for Studying How Microbes Influence Their Environment
A diverse group of scientists suggests a common framework and targeting of known microbial processes [more...]

Aug 08, 2019
Nutrient-Hungry Peatland Microbes Reduce Carbon Loss Under Warmer Conditions
Enzyme production in peatlands reduces carbon lost to respiration under future high temperatures. [more...]

Aug 05, 2019
Amazon Forest Response to CO2 Fertilization Dependent on Plant Phosphorus Acquisition
AmazonFACE Model Intercomparison. The Science Plant growth is dependent on the availabi [more...]

Jul 29, 2019
A Slippery Slope: Soil Carbon Destabilization
Carbon gain or loss depends on the balance between competing biological, chemical, and physical reac [more...]

Jul 15, 2019
Field Evaluation of Gas Analyzers for Measuring Ecosystem Fluxes
How gas analyzer type and correction method impact measured fluxes. The Science A side- [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)