U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research

BER Research Highlights

Comparing Transport-Specific and Economy-Wide Emissions Reduction Tools
Published: September 15, 2012
Posted: November 20, 2012

Often, computational tools used to reduce oil use and greenhouse gas emissions are not coordinated and can impact the other tool’s efficiency. New U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change has demonstrated the importance of jointly considering the effects of instruments used to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Karplus and colleagues studied a sector-specific tool—fuel economy standards—and compared the results to those under an economy-wide tool, a cap-and-trade system. They then combined the two instruments to assess those effects as well. Using the DOE-supported Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis Model (EPPA), a component of a broader integrated assessment model, the study finds that fuel economy standards are projected to be six to 14 times more expensive than a fuel tax and the results take longer to be seen. The model predicts that increasing fuel efficiency reduces the per-mile cost of driving, incentivizing a modest increase in travel that offsets the total reduction. Fuel efficiency is also only applied to the newest vintage of vehicles, taking many years to affect efficiency of the fleet. The tax provides a direct incentive for households to reduce gasoline use, both by investing in vehicle fuel efficiency and reducing total mileage.

Reference: Karplus, V. J., S. Paltsev, M. Babiker, and J. M. Reilly. 2012. “Should a Vehicle Fuel Economy Standard Be Combined with an Economy-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Constraint? Implications for Energy and Climate Policy in the United States,” Energy Economics, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.001. (Reference link)

Contact: Bob Vallario, SC 23.1, (301) 903-5758
Topic Areas:

  • Research Area: Multisector Dynamics (formerly Integrated Assessment)

Division: SC-23.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, BER


BER supports basic research and scientific user facilities to advance DOE missions in energy and environment. More about BER

Recent Highlights

May 10, 2019
Quantifying Decision Uncertainty in Water Management via a Coupled Agent-Based Model
Considering risk perception can improve the representation of human decision-making processes in age [more...]

May 09, 2019
Projecting Global Urban Area Growth Through 2100 Based on Historical Time Series Data and Future Scenarios
Study provides country-specific urban area growth models and the first dataset on country-level urba [more...]

May 05, 2019
Calibrating Building Energy Demand Models to Refine Long-Term Energy Planning
A new, flexible calibration approach improved model accuracy in capturing year-to-year changes in bu [more...]

May 03, 2019
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of Demeter for Better Downscaling of Global Land Use and Land Cover Projections
Researchers improved the Demeter model’s performance by calibrating key parameters and establi [more...]

Apr 22, 2019
Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
Representation of warm temperature events varies considerably among global climate models, which has [more...]

List all highlights (possible long download time)